26-8-2023 (SINGAPORE) The rules around public housing eligibility in Singapore have traditionally placed significant emphasis on marital status. While jokes about marriage proposals being made through flat applications are common, the government has steadily eased restrictions for singles over the years. Soon, another important change will be introduced that expands location choices for this group.
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced at the recent National Day Rally that from the second half of 2024, eligible single applicants will be able to choose new two-room Build-to-Order (BTO) flats in any public housing estate, not just non-mature areas as is currently the case. This recognises that demographic trends show Singapore’s population of unmarried individuals is growing across many age groups. Data from the 2020 census indicates the number of singles aged 35 and over will rise particularly quickly due to delayed marriages – the median age at first wedding was 30.7 for grooms and 29.3 for brides in 2022, up from 30.1 and 28 respectively a decade prior.
At present, only singles aged 35 and above can access subsidised public housing. Within this, a common grievance is only being permitted to select smaller two-room units despite preferences for more spacious homes. While these restrictions may appear unfair, housing policy must balance multiple priorities given Singapore’s limited land. Ideal accommodation differs from adequate housing, which is the primary goal. Larger flats are in high demand and should rightfully cater to larger family groups on average. As the Prime Minister noted, over 17 applications were received for every five-room or three-generation unit in a recent BTO project.
Residential density is actually similar for two sharing singles or a small family living in a four-room flat. Moreover, many downsize happily to flats this size in later life. So two-room units generally meet the threshold of adequate accommodation for most singles. Some concerns remain that the new policy could reduce incentives for marriage and parenting, important national objectives as the population ages. However, studies from Japan found singles living independently were more likely to wed than those residing with parents. This group was just as interested in relationships but felt less urgency while comfortable at home.
It is also critical not to presume all unmarried locals over 35 choose to be single. Some would have wed had the right partner been found, or past relationships ended poorly through no fault of their own. Their circumstances deserve sympathy rather than judgement. A balanced approach is expanding access while continuing support for traditional family structures.
With this in mind, there are good rationales for the location policy change. It helps include more singles as equity stakeholders in Singapore’s future, promoting stable governance and growth. An ageing society means singles will increasingly take on familial care duties too. Closer housing proximity facilitates intergenerational care exchanges and reduces pressures, especially on unmarried women. Younger applicants not yet eligible may take comfort knowing their needs are also under consideration, like new co-living options.
Overall, an inclusive stance on housing acknowledges singles’ respect and rights and prepares for upcoming demographic shifts. But supportingSingles should extend beyond property. Measures like universal family care leave can support all caregivers regardless of marital status through challenging periods. As future responsibilities change, adjusting policies with empathy and pragmatism will build a sustainable outlook for all in society.
