24-7-2023 (SINGAPORE) As the investigation into the corruption allegations against Transport Minister S Iswaran continues, analysts emphasize the importance of maintaining public trust and confidence through transparency in government communications. However, they also acknowledge the challenges in providing further information while the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) conducts its ongoing probe.
The timing and transparency of government statements on the graft investigation have raised questions since it was initially disclosed that Minister Iswaran was “assisting” with the probe without mentioning his arrest. The revelation of his arrest came later in a separate media statement by the CPIB, leading to perceptions of selective release of information.
Political analyst Eugene Tan, an associate professor of law at the Singapore Management University, highlights the need for the government to provide accurate and timely updates to the public, given the keen public interest in the matter.
The government has clarified that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong did not reveal Minister Iswaran’s arrest earlier because they wanted to align with the CPIB’s initial statement. The CPIB’s operational discretion in releasing information has been stressed by the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO).
While analysts understand the need to protect the ongoing investigations, they suggest that greater transparency and coordination in releasing information could alleviate suspicions and allegations. Dr Felix Tan, a political analyst at Nanyang Technological University, emphasizes the importance of early transparency to eliminate future doubts.
Addressing the online rumours circulating about the case is another crucial aspect of managing public perception. Analysts concur that the government must actively debunk and clarify these rumours to prevent further speculation. Dr Woo Jun Jie, senior research fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies, notes that debunking rumours decisively is vital during crises.
Regarding the seriousness of the potential corruption offences, Dr Tan highlights the distinction between personal indiscretions and corruption. While personal indiscretions relate to moral standing, corruption involves intent to cheat and poses a more severe threat to the system and processes.
